It seems like everyone these days can agree on what tastes
good and what tastes bad –for example the cake on the left looks delicious, but
the baby mouse donut on the right - although most of us have never tasted it
before - doesn’t seem to trigger our appetite, no matter how hungry we may be.
So what exactly drives our taste perception and preferences?
Many of us think taste is independent of our other senses (Drewnowski 1997), but try eating a jelly bean while holding your nose closed with your other hand (Small 2008) – you can’t seem to taste the flavor now, can you? In fact, smell – along with other chemical irritations - plays a large component in our judgment of taste. Most of us might have learned this in grade school, but here’s something new: Beauchamp, Gary & Mennella recently published a paper on their discovery that in addition to being innate, taste can also be learned both pre- and post- natally. The 5 taste preferences: sweet, sour, salty, bitter, umami, and savory are developed at different stages in life – in fact, an infant innately prefers sweet, umami, and salty flavors over the others due to the nutritional needs these tastes provide in order for the infant to survive. Glucose is essential for anabolic and catabolic processes, explaining the innate tendency to favor sweet foods, while proteins are essential in muscle building and enzyme functioning, justifyingthe umami preference. Salt, too, is necessary to help buffer membranes, and help drive neuronal signals. In contrast, sour and bitter flavors are disfavored early on because these substances are 1) not necessary for proper bodily functioning and 2) are most likely harmful to the individual. In fact, our “gag” response to such appalling flavors is a reflex, informing us to avoid potentially toxic substances that may lead to sickness or even death. Evolution has affected our taste preferences before we are even able to recognize it!
Despite this evolutionary basis, these inherent tendencies
can be changed both pre-and post-natally (Beauchamp et al 2009). These choices can
result in drastic life-long food preferences and in turn, can potentially determine
the long-term health of the individual. For example: children who were fed milk
daily and kept drinking milk until middle-age will retain lactase, the enzyme
that breaks down milk lactose (Holden, Mace 2003; Simoons 2007); however, those
individuals who stop drinking milk in their infancy and suddenly drink milk in
their teens may develop lactose intolerance (Food Reactions). Why does this
occur? Humans only depend on their mother’s milk in their infancy – once infants
are no longer breast-fed they naturally loose lactase since it is no longer
needed - they no longer “require” milk for development. This is the
evolutionary perspective, yet these days humans continue to consume milk past
their infancy, but from cows rather than from their mothers. Because this
development is, in a sense "unnatural", we retain our enzyme if we continuously drink
milk, but if we stop drinking milk for some time, we lose it.
Here is another example with greater consequences: many individuals
who are overweight/obese and who grow up consuming excessive sweets are more prone
to develop type II diabetes in which their bodies produce insulin, but cannot respond
to it (Lieberman 2003). So why exactly are we so attracted to sweets and fats
if doing so increases the odds of chronic disease and obesity? The evolutionary
reason is that these substances contain a high concentration of energy (carbs,
calories, glucose), keeping us full for a longer period of time. Back in the
day, humans had to scavenge for food - a process that took much time and energy,
and if food was not found in time, the individual would starve and die. Thus,
foods with high energy were favored over those with less energy, such as fruits
and veggies since they provided greater energy over a longer period of time.
Over the centuries, the increased efficiency and prevalence of domesticated
livestock and fast-food choices have led to both over-consumption and a more
sedentary lifestyle, contributing to the prevalence of obesity and type II
diabetes seen today.
As the occurrence of these chronic illnesses increases, it becomes
ever more important to establish good eating habits, which is where Beauchamp
et al’s paper comes into play: these researchers discovered that an infant’s
taste preference can be altered depending on what the pregnant mother’s diet.
Thus, in order to for the infant to “defy evolutionary preferences” and favor
bitter flavors such as vegetables over sweet, unhealthy ones such as cake and
candy bars, a pregnant woman should simply eat more fruits and vegetables
during her pregnancy in order for the infant to become familiar with and “learn” to prefer
these flavors over the innate ones. This study suggests a simple mechanism to promote healthy foods
at an earlier age in face of the increased convenience and attraction to
unhealthy foods due to marketing.
- Effie
Sources:
Beauchamp, Gary K; Mennella, Julie A. Early Flavor Learning.2009.
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition. Volume 48: S25-S30 (doi:
10.1097/MPG.0b013e31819774a5) link: http://journals.lww.com/jpgn/Fulltext/2009/03001/Early_Flavor_Learning_and_Its_Impact_on_Later.5.aspx.
Drewnowski A.Taste preferences and food intake. 1997. Annu
Rev Nutr. Vol 17: 237-53.
Food Intolerance – A Comprehensive Guide to Lactose
Intolerance: http://www.foodreactions.org/intolerance/lactose/.
Holden, C., Mace, R. Phylogenetic Analysis of the Evolution
of Lactose Digestion in Adults.2009. Human Biology. Vol 81(5-6):597-619. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3378/027.081.0609.
Lieberman, S. Dietary, evolutionary, and modernizing
influences on the prevalence of type 2 diabetes. 2003. Annual Review of
Nutrition. Vol. 23: 345-377. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.23.011702.073212.
Simoons, F. Primary adult lactose intolerance and the
milking habit: A problem in biologic and cultural interrelations . 2007.
Digestive Diseases and Sciences. Vol 15, (8): 695-710, doi: 10.1007/BF02235991.
Small, D. How does the way food looks or its smell influence
taste? 2008 Vol 4. (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=experts-how-does-sight-smell-affect-taste.
This is fascinating. I didn't know that pregnant women could influence their future child's diet like that. This seems like really good information for doctors and clinics to share with pregnant women as soon as possible, as their diets could have a lasting effect. So interesting!
ReplyDelete-Hayley Hemstreet
Interesting post.
ReplyDeleteYou have to winder though, vegetables taste bitter even for adults. Which is a little strange since bitterness generally indicates foods that might be toxic for us, and yet vegetables are some of the healthiest foods.
Would've been nice if we evolved to perceive vegetables as being as tasty as Doritos. Would make eating healthy easier at least.
Whoa, I didn't know that taste preferences are influenced by a mother's choices during pregnancy. I wonder then what is the significance of the "cravings" that pregnant women allegedly have. Maybe they are reflections of the woman's own preference for high-energy foods, or perhaps they are meant to shape the baby's preference for these sorts of foods.
ReplyDeleteI didn't realized I share the taste preference for food since I was still inside my mum...
ReplyDeleteHere is something about taste I would like to share. It is hypothesized that food taste sweet is generally high in carbohydrate, which is probably the easiest thing for us to digest to obtain energy and utilized. This might contribute to the genetic basis for the preference for food!
Nice Poster!
This was very interesting! Like the rest, I was very impressed to hear that food preference begin forming during development. Do you know if other studies exist examining this phenomenon? It would be interesting to know how much of a particular food a pregnant women should consume if she hopes to confer a fondness for it to her child. Great post!
ReplyDeleteCaleb
Wow! I wonder exactly how much influence a mother's diet during pregnancy can have. I know that the genetic ability to taste PTC determines a lot of people's food preferences (for instance, tasters usually hate brussels sprouts while nontasters are more likely to like them). I wonder if a mother's diet could in a way override that genetic tendency, or at least make the bitter taste of PTC desirable to the baby?
ReplyDelete